I’m presently 64, vested at 66 for full benefits.
It really depends on personal circumstances, and the question only reflects part of the information necessary to make the best decision.
Social Security benefits represent a lifetime annuity in retirement, and in later years it may be especially important to receive as large an income as possible because cost-of-living adjustments will be applied to the initial amount of benefits and usually are less than the inflation affecting retirees.
If the person is in good health with a reasonably long life expectancy, expects to work until at least age 66, and can live on the $55,000 salary for two more years, then it is better to wait until full retirement age at 66 since the benefits increase by 7 percent each year. That is more than what could be earned if taking the benefit now, paying income tax on 85 percent of the benefit collected, and investing the after tax net Social Security income in a safe investment for two years. However, if there are health concerns or a family history of illnesses that could shorten life expectancy to below the average, then it may make sense to take the reduced benefit.
Answered by: Ibolya Balog, CPA, is an associate professor at Cedar Crest College in Allentown, Pa.