Professional Issues Tracker

PA State Flag

Welcome to the PIT

The Professional Issues Tracker keeps you informed of the legislation, testimony, statements, and thought leadership the PICPA is providing on behalf of all Pennsylvania CPAs and the accounting profession.

This is how we build a better profession.

Peter Calcara and Jen Cryder with bill amending the CPA Law

Happening now

Licensure, Mobility, and the Future of the Profession

The PICPA has been working with lawmakers in Harrisburg to amend Pennsylvania's CPA Law. These amendments introduce critical updates to the licensure process, aligning with the evolving needs of the accounting profession and the dynamic environment in which it operates.

We are excited to announce that Sens. Scott Hutchinson and Nick Pisciottano released a co-sponsor memo to ask their colleagues in the Senate to sign onto a bill amending the CPA Law. This bill aims to address the challenges faced by the accounting profession by introducing two key provisions:

  • First, it establishes an additional education pathway to CPA licensure in Pennsylvania
  • Second, it provides for automatic practice mobility, enhancing professional flexibility across state lines.

Your Opinion Matters

Many states are taking legislative action to change CPA licensure laws. Get involved! Ask your lawmakers to co-sponsor legislation to expand access to the CPA profession.

Contact Your Legislator

Read our full responses here:

We are currently tracking 23 issues relevant to the accounting profession.

We are spearheading change to ensure a solid future.

Four students in business attire laughing

Challenges Facing the CPA Profession

Credit requirements, testing, and awareness of the profession affect the future of accounting.

See how we're addressing these challenges

Legislative Initiatives

CPA Licensure and Practice Mobility

The issue

The demand for CPAs and other accounting professionals continues to grow, yet the number of individuals entering the field is falling short of meeting this need. In 2022, the number of candidates taking the CPA Exam hit its lowest point in nearly two decades. Compounding this issue, the number of accounting degrees awarded between 2020 and 2022 declined by 7.8%. These trends underscore the urgent need for action to address workforce challenges and ensure the profession’s vitality.

Our position

The PICPA supports legislation designed to address critical updates to the licensure process in Pennsylvania, reflecting both the evolving needs of the accounting profession and the dynamic landscape in which it operates. PICPA-backed legislation proposes two significant changes to Pennsylvania’s CPA licensure process.

First, it introduces an additional pathway to licensure. Under current law, candidates must complete a master’s degree or 150 credit hours of education (including the required accounting concentration), gain one year of professional experience, and pass the Uniform CPA Exam to become licensed in Pennsylvania. While this pathway will remain intact, the PICPA supports creating an alternative option to qualify for licensure: candidates with a bachelor’s degree (including the required accounting concentration), two years of professional experience, and successful completion of the CPA Exam.

Second, the PICPA supports simplifying practice mobility for qualified CPAs from out of state. These individuals would be allowed to work in Pennsylvania without obtaining a Pennsylvania certificate and permit, which is current law under substantial equivalency, provided they meet specific requirements:

  • Hold a CPA license in good standing in their home state
  • Have at least a bachelor’s degree and completed an accounting concentration in coursework
  • Have passed the CPA Exam
  • Have completed an appropriate experience requirement 

Status: The PICPA is working with Sens. Scott Hutchinson (R-Venango) and Nick Pisciottano, CPA-Inactive (D-Allegheny) to introduce legislation in the Senate. We are also working with Reps. Ben Sanchez, CPA-Inactive (D-Montgomery) and Keith Greiner, CPA (R-Lancaster) in the House to address this issue.

Reviewed April 2025

Advocating for Thoughtful Tax Policy and Analysis

The issue

Each year, as part of the state budget process, Pennsylvania lawmakers routinely consider changes to the state’s tax system. Any proposal — whether a sweeping overhaul or a minor adjustment — necessitates a thorough and consistent approach to analysis and comparison.

Our position

The PICPA stands ready to assist. To guide the evaluation of tax proposals, the PICPA advocates for the adoption of the 12 Guiding Principles of Good Tax Policy, a framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), which ensures that changes to Pennsylvania’s tax system are evaluated through an objective lens, utilizing recognized benchmarks of effective tax policy.

By leveraging this framework, policymakers, stakeholders, and taxpayers can better assess the merits of proposed tax changes, fostering transparency, fairness, and effectiveness in Pennsylvania’s tax system.

Status: The PICPA is committed to working with lawmakers and stakeholders to uphold these principles, ensuring Pennsylvania’s tax policies reflect the highest standards of good governance. As an example of this commitment to providing technically relevant tax information, please see the PICPA Issue Brief on Combined Reporting

Reviewed April 2025

Charitable Giving Bill

The issue

State Reps. Abigail Salisbury (D-Allegheny) and Keith Greiner, CPA (R-Lancaster), have reintroduced legislation supported by the PICPA that would raise the monetary threshold that subjects charitable organizations to more extensive financial oversight, including mandatory audits. Under House Bill 965, charitable organizations receiving annual contributions of $1 million or more (currently $750,000) would be required to have an audit. Those receiving contributions of less than $1 million would have different levels of review or compilation required on their financial statements to be performed by an independent CPA.

Our position

The PICPA believes this legislation will benefit many not-for-profit organizations while also relieving human capital pressures in the CPA community. 

Status: House Bill 965 was referred to the House State Government Committee on March 19, 2025.

Reviewed April 2025

E-Filing Local Tax Reform

The issue

To simplify local tax compliance for Pennsylvania taxpayers and tax practitioners, the PICPA is advocating for the Pennsylvania General Assembly to modernize the electronic filing of local earned income tax returns to leverage existing systems and minimize costs and operational disruptions. The IRS’s Modernized e-File (MeF) program enables taxpayers and tax professionals to electronically file tax returns directly with federal and state authorities. This system converts tax forms into a digital format, allowing tax preparation software to transmit the federal return to the IRS, which then forwards the relevant information to state tax authorities.

Our position

Currently, taxpayers can use the MeF system to electronically file both federal and state returns. Extending this process to local earned income taxes would streamline compliance and bring much-needed efficiency to Pennsylvania’s local tax system.

Status: PICPA continues to meet with legislators, the Department of Community and Economic Development (DCED), and local collectors to move this work forward. Our proposal has been well received.

Reviewed April 2025

Optional Entity-Level SALT Cap Workaround

The issue

The federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 imposes a $10,000 limitation on the deduction individual taxpayers may claim for state and local taxes paid for tax years 2018-2025 (SALT cap). This limitation presents challenges for taxpayers, particularly owners and shareholders of businesses structured as partnerships or S corporations. Income generated from the activities of these pass-through entities is currently taxed at the owner level at Pennsylvania’s 3.07% personal income tax rate.

Our position

The PICPA is urging state lawmakers to adopt legislation introduced by Sen. Doug Mastriano (R-Franklin) that provides a revenue-neutral elective pass-through entity tax (PTET). Senate Bill 396 would allow the tax to be paid at the entity level and facilitate the federal deductibility of state income taxes. In doing so, Pennsylvania would align with other states that have already enacted similar legislation to provide their constituents with a path to increased federal tax deductions. To date, 36 of the 41 states imposing a personal income tax have passed similar legislation.

Status: Congress is currently considering options which may extend and/or modify the SALT cap, which may continue to impact Pennsylvania taxpayers. Sen. Mastriano reported in his co-sponsorship memo that over 400,000 pass-through entities file tax returns in Pennsylvania, many of which would benefit from this legislation.

SB 396 was reported from the Senate Finance Committee on April 1, 2025, and is now pending in the Appropriations Committee. A companion bill will be introduced in the Pennsylvania House by Rep. Keith Greiner, CPA (R-Lancaster).

Reviewed April 2025

Resident Partner Credit

The issue

Pennsylvania resident partners subject to pass-through entity taxes (PTET) in other states may face double taxation due to the denial of a Pennsylvania resident tax credit. This issue arises even though the taxes paid through PTET to other states are equivalent to those which would otherwise be paid directly by Pennsylvania residents to those other states. The Pennsylvania Department of Revenue (DOR) has stated that resident partners are not entitled to a credit against personal income tax for PTET paid to other states. However, this stance differs from the DOR’s position on resident S corporation shareholders, who are eligible for a similar credit against their personal income tax.

Our position

The PICPA is urging state lawmakers to adopt legislation introduced by Sen. Doug Mastriano (R-Franklin) that extends equivalent credits to resident partners and S corporation shareholders. Senate Bill 253 addresses this inequity and mitigating the risk of double taxation.

Status: SB 253 was reported from the Senate Finance Committee on April 1, 2025, and is now pending in the Senate Appropriations Committee. A companion bill will be introduced in the Pennsylvania House by Reps. Ben Sanchez, CPA-Inactive (D-Montgomery) and Keith Greiner, CPA (R-Lancaster).

Reviewed April 2025

Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting

The issue

Under the Corporate Transparency Act, which went into effect on Jan. 1, 2024, businesses that meet certain criteria became subject to a filing requirement to submit a Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) Report to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). 

Our position

The Jan. 1, 2025, deadline for BOI reports that previously applied to most small businesses should be delayed. In November 2024, FinCEN, which oversees BOI reporting, had received about 6.5 million of the estimated 32 million reports that it expected to be filed. Another concern was the tight 30-day timeline to report amendments and changes. The timeline made raising client awareness more complex for tax professionals who may notice changes that need updating during their annual client meetings prior to tax filing.

Status: The U.S. Treasury Department announced on March 2, 2025, that it will not enforce penalties for non-submission of beneficial ownership reporting under the Corporate Transparency Act, per the March 21, 2025, deadline and after rule changes. FinCEN issued an interim final rule on March 21, 2025, that removes the requirement for U.S. companies and U.S. persons to report beneficial ownership information to FinCEN under the Corporate Transparency Act. Thus, through this interim final rule, all entities created in the United States — including those previously known as “domestic reporting companies” — and their beneficial owners will be exempt from the requirement to report BOI to FinCEN. Foreign entities that meet the new definition of a "reporting company" and do not qualify for an exemption from the reporting requirements must report their BOI to FinCEN under new deadlines. Read the full notice here.

Reviewed April 2025

A&A and Ethics

A&A

Charter School Audit Requirements - Act 55 of 2024

The issue

Senate Bill 700, signed into law as Act 55, on July 11, 2024, is an omnibus measure that introduced numerous amendments to the Pennsylvania School Code. Among its provisions are new audit requirements that raised concerns for PICPA upon review.

Our position

PICPA analyzed the legislation and identified several key issues, particularly provisions that appear to conflict with current professional auditing standards. 

Status: In early 2025, PICPA developed and distributed an Issue Brief outlining our concerns. The brief includes illustrative examples related to government auditing standards, scope of work, and audit boundaries. It was shared with the Pennsylvania Department of Education and relevant members of the Pennsylvania General Assembly and other key stakeholder groups.

Reviewed April 2025

Audit Quality and Standards

The issue

The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct requires practitioners to maintain a high level of practice excellence. This is an ongoing challenge.

Our position

We support high and consistent audit quality and rigorous standards that support high audit quality. To raise awareness of the need to maintain high audit quality, the PICPA has hosted a town hall on the AICPA’s Quality Management Standards and the results of the DOL Audit Quality study, and are working on additional education highlighting performance challenges. We are also monitoring the AICPA projects on standards revisions related to fraud that are intended to improve audit quality. 

Status: The PICPA issued a comment letter on June 5, 2024.

Read the IAASB proposal

Reviewed April 2025

Increasing Investor Access and Facilitating Capital Formation

The issue

The U.S. House Committee on Financial Services held hearings on February 26, 2025 regarding legislative proposals to increase investor access and facilitate capital formation. Feedback was requested on four areas: access to capital, investor access, public markets and company lifecycle, and technology and artificial intelligence in capital markets. PICPA provided feedback to the questions related to public markets and company lifecycle and technology and artificial intelligence in capital markets. 

Our position

Our primary concerns related to increasing costs and compliance burden stemming from recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) actions and the impact of these pressures on small firms in particular. We support changes at the SEC and PCAOB that will reduce the regulatory burden that increases costs unnecessarily and discourages small and mid-sized audit firms from auditing small public companies.

Status: The PICPA submitted a response to the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services.

Listen to this summary from Allison Henry, vice president of professional and technical standards.

Reviewed April 2025

PCAOB Proposed Rule on NOCLAR

The issue

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's (PCAOB) noncompliance with laws and regulations (NOCLAR) proposal would fundamentally change the nature and scope of the audit by proposing to change the auditor’s responsibility for identifying noncompliance with laws and regulations. These responsibilities would be greatly expanded to include those agencies having an indirect impact on the financial statements or operational compliance such as EPA, OSHA, FDIC, FDA, FCPA, and AML on privacy laws, tax laws, and consumer protection laws.

Our position

The PICPA is vigorously advocating against the untenable expansion of the scope of the audit proposed by the PCAOB. Legislative outreach efforts are in progress. PICPA members are strongly encouraged to reach out to their state congressional representatives — U.S. Reps. Mike KelleyBrian Fitzpatrick, and U.S. Sen. John Fetterman — to make them aware of this significant issue.

Status: The PCAOB has delayed action on the proposed NOCLAR standard after strong feedback from audit firms and stakeholders, including the PICPA.

  • Outreach to U.S. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick to schedule a meeting - July 9, 2024 
  • Outreach to U.S. Reps. Bill Huizenga (MI), Ann Wagner (MO), and Dan Meuser (PA) - Sept. 4, 2024
  • PICPA Met with Rep. Huizenga’s staff to discuss concerns over the NOCLAR proposal and the aggressive PCAOB agenda, as well as Huizenga’s previous proposal to fold PCAOB into the SEC. - Sept. 27, 2024

Reviewed April 2025

PCAOB Proposals: Firm Reporting and Firm and Engagement Metrics

The issue

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) issued two proposals that would greatly increase the information firms would be required to report externally, including more detailed fee information, financial and operational information, and policies and procedures that relate to engagements for private company audit clients and for nonaudit services, cybersecurity policies and procedures. The proposals call for a vague and all-encompassing incident report requirement, details on firm governance and structure and the process for making changes to that structure, and a summary description of the firm’s policies and procedures, even for inactive firms. The largest firms also would be required to provide U.S. GAAP financial statements. Many of these proposed requirements would include information related to private company audits and services for nonattest clients, which we believe is outside of the PCAOB’s statutory authority. Proposed engagement and firm metrics include information on time reporting (e.g., average hours worked by partners each quarter), experience of personnel, retention rates, hours spent by senior level professionals on material audit areas, results of internal inspections, restatements, and the use of specialists and shared-service centers, etc.

Our position

The PICPA is concerned regarding the magnitude and granularity of the proposed requirements. The costs of compliance would be astronomical and would not contribute to improving audit quality. Instead, they would further strain the pipeline and challenge the already constrained talent pipeline. The PICPA also argued that investors would not have sufficient context to understand many of the proposed metrics, including the results of a firm’s internal inspection findings. While the PCAOB’s proposal is predicated upon the need to provide investors with additional information to assist in their ratification of the auditor, in many cases investor votes on ratification are nonbinding. We believe that audit committees already access much of this information, and this required reporting disintermediates the role of the audit committees. 

Status: After making some revisions based on feedback received, the PCAOB voted to adopt the new standards in late November of 2024 and forwarded them for Securities and Exchange Commission approval. The PICPA responded to the SEC on both of the proposals and met with Congressman Dan Meuser’s office to encourage the SEC to extend the response deadline into the next administration. On Jan. 10 the SEC extended the comment period to Feb. 4th. Then on Feb. 11th the PCAOB withdrew the originally approved rules. On Jan. 10 the SEC extended the comment period to Feb. 4th. Then on Feb. 11th the PCAOB withdrew the originally approved rules.

Reviewed April 2025

Proposed Regs Governing Practice Before the IRS

The issue

Treasury Department Circular 230 (Circular 230) provides guidance for attorneys, certified public accountants (CPAs), enrolled agents (EAs), enrolled retirement plan agents, and other persons with representation rights before the IRS (31 C.F.R. Part 10). Circular 230 was last revised in June 2014, and many legal, economic, and technological changes have occurred that affect practice before the IRS since the last revision. The proposed regulations (REG-116610-20) seek to update Circular 230 and harmonize those regulations with changes in law.

Our position

We support Treasury’s efforts to modernize Circular 230 regulations, but believe significant changes are needed before these important regulations are finalized. Key areas of concern include:

  • Broad language that does not include materiality consideration
  • Potential restrictions on contingency fees
  • Regulatory control over fees
  • Best practice guidance that is misguided (focusing on understanding the risks and benefits of all technology tools used), too detailed (data security and incidence reporting and business continuity and succession planning), and potentially impossible to implement (e.g., taking action in the event of a practitioner’s mental impairment)
  • Subjective behavioral guidance
  • Other
We believe that the proposed revisions have been rushed and that the comment period should be extended past the April 15, 2025, tax-filing deadline to ensure that there is adequate time for due process. Additional time is needed for a more thorough analysis of other sections (e.g., appraisers). These regulations have a significant impact on practice, and it is important to ensure that they are sufficiently robust without going beyond what is legally permissible. Further analysis is required to determine the potential impact on practice standards and compliance requirements, to correct and/or clarify vague enforcement provisions, and to delete provisions that overreach regulatory authority, are arbitrary, or can be inconsistently applied. Further consideration is also needed to ensure that there are adequate guardrails surrounding unlicensed, unenrolled tax practitioners.

Status: The PICPA has submitted a response to the Treasury Department expressing our concerns regarding the proposed rules and requesting an extension of time for improved due process.

Reviewed April 2025

Input on the Private Company Counsel

The issue

The Financial Accounting Foundation requested input on the Private Company Counsel (PCC). Specific questions included the effectiveness of the PCC, potential areas of improvements, whether the PCC has been successful in proposing alternatives within GAAP that address the needs of users of private company financial statements, whether the FASB has been appropriately responsive to the needs of private companies and the recommendations from the PCC, whether changes to the standard-setting process for private companies are warranted, and suggestions about changes to the size, composition, term length, or responsibilities of the PCC.

Our position

The PICPA acknowledges that a number of significant changes were made when the PCC was first established, but we believe improvements are needed to ensure that the PCC represents the financial reporting needs of smaller organizations. Our response noted that many privately held entities have switched their financial reporting framework to alternative special purpose frameworks other than U.S. GAAP due to cost considerations. However, this use of special purpose financial reporting frameworks is not in the public interest since many are not sufficiently robust (e.g., tax basis) to appropriately present an organization’s financial performance and others (e.g., special purpose framework for small to medium sized entities) are not commonly accepted. The PICPA believes that improvements can be made to the PCC to ensure that the needs of privately held entities are timely met.

Status: Invited Jere Shawver, chair of the PCC, to speak at PICPA’s A&A conference to highlight recent PCC initiatives. We are seeing an uptick in PCC activity and an increased focus on providing practical expedients and policy elections to reduce financial reporting complexity for privately held companies. - Sept. 27, 2024

Reviewed April 2025

PCAOB Inspection Results and Enforcement Actions 

The issue

Recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspection reports reveal exaggerated deficiency levels that contradict the positive trends in audit quality. The PCAOB’s 2023 report shows 46% of reviewed engagements had at least one significant Part I.A deficiency, meaning firms lacked sufficient evidence to support their audit opinions. U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Sheldon Whitehouse described the results as “astonishing” and urged the PCAOB to take significant actions.

Our position

We disagree. Although audit quality can improve, PCAOB’s pass/fail model does not provide a full picture. Changes to PCAOB’s inspection reports are necessary. Similarly, the rise in enforcement action is concerning, and it may worsen talent acquisition pressures due to a hostile regulatory climate.  

Status:

  • Enforcement vs. progress: Audit reform amid heavy regulation, written by PICPA’ Allison Henry, highlights the disconnect between improvements in certain key audit metrics (e.g., restatement trends) and extreme PCAOB enforcement actions. The article discusses the negative impact of regulatory overreach on the profession, the talent pipeline, and the public trust. – Oct. 18, 2024

  • PICPA proposes revisions to the PCAOB’s inspection reports to better articulate the degree of severity of the inspection findings. – Oct. 30, 2024

Reviewed April 2025

Quality Control Standards

The issue

On May 13, 2024, the Public Company Accounting and Oversight Board adopted A Firm's System of Quality Control and Other Amendments to PCAOB Standards, Rules, and Forms. The PCAOB adopted a standard that it believes will lead registered public accounting firms to significantly improve their Quality Control (QC) systems. An effective QC system protects investors by facilitating the consistent preparation and issuance of informative, accurate, independent, and compliant engagement reports. Properly conducted audits and other engagements enhance the confidence of investors and other market participants in the information firms report on.

Our position

We support rigorous audit quality and the modernization of audit standards that will achieve that end. Thus, we believe that the proposed standards should be weighed against the overall objective of improving audit quality and the expected costs. We are concerned that this proposal will not improve audit quality, but instead will reduce competition, increase audit fees, and introduce conflicts with international standards.

Status: The PICPA issued a comment letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on June 24, 2024.

Reviewed April 2025

Ethics

Tax Planning and Related Services

The issue

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) proposed revisions to the Code of Professional Conduct (the Code) are intended to develop a principles-based framework, leveraging the fundamental principles and the conceptual framework of the Code to guide practitioners when providing tax planning and related services to clients or performing tax planning activities for employing organizations.

Our position

The PICPA has significant concerns regarding this far-reaching proposal that would potentially conflict with authoritative tax regulations, expose tax practitioners to additional legal liability, and require accountants to factor stakeholder perceptions into their proposed tax planning services. The adoption of these aggressive tax standards could jeopardize the use of the CPA credential for tax planning services.

Status: The IESBA finalized the new standard addressing some of the areas the PICPA found to be troublesome. However, as a result of our feedback the AICPA Professional Ethics Executive Committee is considering not fully converging with many of the problematic requirements in the new IESBA standard. We are monitoring the related PEEC project and provided feedback on the related proposed revised interpretation, Tax Services (ET Sec. 1295.160) – Sept. 10, 2024

Reviewed April 2025

Using the Work of an External Expert

The issue

The Exposure Draft on Using the Work of an External Expert proposes an ethical framework to guide professional accountants or sustainability assurance practitioners, as applicable, in evaluating whether an external expert has the necessary competence, capabilities and objectivity in order to use that expert’s work for the intended purposes. The proposals also include provisions to aid in applying the Code of Professional Conduct’s conceptual framework when using the work of an external expert.

Our position

The PICPA supports the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' (IESBA) efforts to ensure that public accountants use external experts who are objective and competent and agrees with the decision not to require all external experts to be independent. However, we believe that the proposed Section 5390 on using the work of an external expert for sustainability assurance providers should be considered holistically in connection with the Proposed International Ethics Standards for Sustainability Assurance (discussed below).

Status: The PICPA issued a comment letter on April 30, 2024.

Read the proposal

Reviewed April 2025

IESBA - Ethics Standards for Sustainability Assurance

The issue

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) approved the proposed new International Ethics Standards for Sustainability Assurance (including International Independence Standards) (IESSA) and proposed Revisions to the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (the Code) on Sustainability Reporting. The Exposure Draft contains proposed independence standards for use by all sustainability assurance practitioners regardless of whether they are professional accountants, and specific ethics provisions relevant to sustainability reporting and assurance.

Our position

The PICPA supports the IESBA’s efforts to develop ethics standards applicable to practitioners performing sustainability assurance engagements. Fundamentally, the PICPA has concerns with the broader effort to develop profession-agnostic standards without evaluating how the standards work together with education, training, peer review, licensure, regulatory, and enforcement mechanisms similar to those of public accountants.

 

Status: The PICPA issued a comment letter on May 10, 2024.

Read the draft from IESBA

Reviewed April 2025

Licensure and Pipeline

CPA Exam Window Extension

The issue

To increase the accounting pipeline capacity and remove further barriers to entry within the industry, it's important to rethink the 18-month window to pass all parts of the CPA Exam.

Our position

The PICPA supports extending the exam window from 18 to 30 months. In addition to our support of reinstating credits for exams lost during the pandemic, the PICPA has encouraged the State Board to adopt the new suggested window of time for future candidates to complete their exam.

Status: Approved

Update: Regulations are unlikely to be adopted until mid-2025, and the PICPA continues to work with stakeholders and policymakers on this issue. We encourage any candidates who currently meet the requirements to continue to apply for extensions as needed.

A Win for the Profession: The Importance of NASBA's CPA Exam Window Extension
by PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder, CPA, MBA

NASBA approves one-year extension to CPA Exam window
Journal of Accountancy

Reviewed April 2025

Work and Learn

The issue

According to research conducted by the Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) and PICPA, the significant time and cost associated with the pursuit of 150 credit hours of education in order to get the CPA license is a barrier for those considering a career in accounting. The additional 30 credits beyond a bachelor’s degree is leading many candidates to reconsider their choice of career or delay pursuing licensure.

Our position

Providing work-and-learn programs and opportunities offers a practical, feasible solution to help grow the accounting profession. The PICPA is helping to facilitate these programs and encouraging higher education institutions and firm leaders to adopt these programs.

Download the Work-and-Learn Toolkit
For Higher Education and Public Accounting Firms

Work-and-Learn Models for CPA Candidates: Taking Action to Eliminate Barriers
by PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder, CPA, MBA

Pennsylvania CPAs Try Out Work-and-Learn Model
Accounting Today

Reviewed April 2025

CPA Credit Relief Initiative

The issue

In response to significant health, economic, education, and travel disruptions resulting in CPA Examination candidate hardships, extensions were proposed for any CPA Examination credits that expired from Jan. 30, 2020, through May 11, 2023.

Our position

The PICPA supports the Credit Relief Initiative and encourages the Pennsylvania State Board of Accountancy to adopt the policy. We also encourage all of our CPA candidate members to apply for credit relief by the March 31 deadline.

Status: Passed December 2023

Update: 223 Pennsylvania candidates received credit for lost exam sections restored.

Reviewed April 2025

NPAG Report and Pipeline Promise

The issue

The National Pipeline Advisory Group (NPAG) was created to develop a unified strategy that reflects the needs of multiple stakeholders, leverages unbiased research, and leads to meaningful change. The Advisory Group is focused on boosting awareness of the profession’s vital role, driving innovative pipeline strategies, and ensuring the next generation of accountants is prepared for tomorrow’s challenges. The NPAG reflects diverse perspectives from across the profession.

Our position

The PICPA supports NPAG's findings and report. We're encouraging our members to take the Pipeline Pledge, an individual commitment to participate in two activities of your choosing that can influence and grow the talent pool.

Read the Final Strategy Report
NPAG

Reviewed April 2025

The Profession and Long-Term Human Capital Strategy

The CPA Pipeline Crisis

The issue

The pipeline challenges the profession are facing are reflective of the fact that relevance of CPAs are in question. Firms must lean on business model transformation to fix the relevance problem and thus pipeline. Firms are struggling to attract new talent, keep their Gen 2 or Gen 3 around, and grow their practice.

Our position

The PICPA believes it is critical that business owners and executives in the accounting profession look inward and plan for significant adjustments to address our current pipeline and quality challenges. Firms must look at how their current model is set up and determine if it's time to change. The next generation of CPAs must be provided with more to unlock their potential and keep them interested. Firms can do this by building more distinct career paths, adding new revenue opportunities or client services and automating or digitizing their business. This will give employees a greater sense of purpose while increasing revenue channels. Clients have come to value CPAs as business advisors and not just bookkeepers. By expanding client services to encompass consulting, mergers and acquisitions, and more, accounting firms can better support their CPAs, fostering professional growth and development. Such a diversified service portfolio allows these firms to cross-sell to clients, strengthening client relationships and ensuring long-term business sustainability. The tech-savvy generations coming into the profession are increasingly drawn to career paths that promise innovation and technological advancement, and presenting accounting in this light will be a significant draw. CPA firms must also rethink their equity and compensation strategy. Rethinking an entire business model and implementing meaningful changes won't happen overnight, but the conversation needs to be had before it is too late.

Why the CPA Profession Needs to Overcome its Challenges Quickly and Collaboratively
by PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder, CPA, MBA

The Evolving Role of State Societies
The Unique CPA Podcast

Why the CPA qualification’s 150-hour college credit rule is outdated–and inequitable
Fortune

Despite Record Profits, Accounting Firms Must Change Business Models. Here’s Why…
by PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder, CPA, MBA

Reviewed October 2024

Dual Enrollment

The issue

Early exposure to accounting is proven to be influential to students choosing majors and future career plans. There is also significant cost associated with obtaining a college degree and, specifically, the additional credits needed for a CPA license. Offering high school students the chance to enroll in a college accounting course not only introduces them to exciting curriculum, but also offers an affordable way to begin obtaining college credits.

Our position

The PICPA has partnered with Outlier to offer a 3 credit, completely virtual asynchronous Intro to Accounting Course through the University of Pittsburgh, paid for by the PICPA. Students participating in the program have a support person at their school who can provide direction through proctoring exam and adhering with course timeline.

Update: 64 students are enrolled in this program for the 2024-2025 school year. Notably, more than half of these participants lacked access to accounting coursework within their own educational institutions.

Why the CPA Profession Needs to Overcome its Challenges Quickly and Collaboratively
by PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder, CPA, MBA

PICPA and Outlier Bring College Accounting to High Schools
by Matt Greene and Kristen Wilbert • CPA Now Blog

Reviewed October 2024

Press Releases