Tax Resources for CPAs

Recent State and Federal Tax Updates


Pennsylvania State and Local Tax

Latest Blogs, Articles, and Podcasts

State & Local Tax

  • Pa. Office Set Up to Help with IRA Renewable Energy Tax Credits

    Mar 12, 2024, 00:00 AM by Louie Krak
    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro created the Office of Critical Investments to maximize the federal funding made available in recent years, particularly through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Louie Krak, infrastructure coordinator with the Office of Critical Investments, discusses the major tax credit incentives that are available to a wide swath of Pennsylvania entities interested in investing in diverse sources of renewable energy.
    Full story
  • Don’t Overlook the Value of State Tax Credits and Incentives

    Mar 12, 2024, 00:00 AM by Matthew Melinson, CPA, Mike Eickhoff, CCIP, Drew VandenBrul, CPA, Narj Bhogal, CPA, Benjamin Tamber, CPA
    Incentives are a powerful tool to urge companies to invest in a particular state that can result in a win-win for all parties involved. This issue's State & Local Tax column provides an overview of Pennsylvania’s incentives and credits landscape.
    Full story

Federal Tax

  • Pa. Office Set Up to Help with IRA Renewable Energy Tax Credits

    Mar 12, 2024, 00:00 AM by Louie Krak
    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro created the Office of Critical Investments to maximize the federal funding made available in recent years, particularly through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Louie Krak, infrastructure coordinator with the Office of Critical Investments, discusses the major tax credit incentives that are available to a wide swath of Pennsylvania entities interested in investing in diverse sources of renewable energy.
    Full story
  • What to Expect on the Federal Tax Front This Election Year

    Mar 12, 2024, 00:00 AM by Robert E. Duquette, CPA
    Although the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 has most of its individual provisions expiring after 2025, there are some provisions expiring even earlier. This column explains which sections will be affected unless Congress acts to restore them.
    Full story
capstan

Capstan - Tax Saving Opportunities for Tangible Property and Other Fixed Assets

In the face of growing tax code complexity, it's almost impossible to cover every area with in-house resources. For expertise in understanding and applying the myriad of complexities with the Tangible Property regulations and other IRS Code impacting commercial real estate, turn to Capstan Tax Stategies.

 
Visit Company

CPA Now Blogs

Taxpayers Will Bear the Burden of Huge Judgements if Sovereign Immunity and Caps Are Removed

Apr 22, 2024, 03:39 AM by Matthew McCann
A case before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is a threat to the ability of the Commonwealth to limit its exposure to liability through the enactment of damages caps. This is important because uncapped liability verdicts could wipe out funds set aside for critical government services, leading to ever higher taxes.

Curt Schroder of the PCCJRBy Curt Schroder


The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s long-standing law granting sovereign and official immunity for the state, its officials, and its employees – as well as caps on damages for these entities – has been a focus in legal circles recently. You may or may not be aware of what is going on, but you should. A case before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is a direct threat to the ability of the Commonwealth to limit its exposure to liability through the enactment of damages caps.

The policy behind sovereign immunity aims to protect the state and its entities from excessive liability and financial burden, thus allowing them to fulfill their governmental functions effectively. But one important aspect in these debates that doesn’t get enough attention, however, is why the law is necessary for taxpayer protection.

Pennsylvania law grants the commonwealth, its officials, and its employees sovereign and official immunity, except when waived. In other words, the state gives permission for it to be sued when it waives immunity in certain situations. Along with this permission structure comes the right to limit its liability exposure.

Gavel surrounded by cashUncapped liability verdicts could bankrupt state or local governments. Because all governments are funded by taxpayers, all it would take is one nuclear verdict (a verdict in excess of $10 million) to wipe out funds set aside for critical government services. Jackpot jury verdicts will mean less money for social services, housing and child welfare programs, fire and police departments, public schools, and more. A huge verdict against Pennsylvania or one of our local governments would inevitably lead to higher taxes asked of taxpayers to cover the costs.

It's important to note that the state’s Legislative Budget and Finance Committee issued a report on this topic and found that more than 99% of the claims fall within the current caps. In other words, more than 99% of injured victims find justice under the current limits that protect taxpayers.

Caps on damages in cases against the state or a political subdivision (city, county, township, or school district) were put in place to protect taxpayers from those seeking jackpot paydays. The fight to overturn the law is being advanced by well-known personal injury attorney Tom Kline. Kline has embarked on a self-described “22-year odyssey” to remove taxpayer protection caps in suits against state and local governments.1 In a petition to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court urging that the Commonwealth Court be bypassed from considering his Freilich v SEPTA case, Kline made the argument that caps are unconstitutional. If his theory prevails and the Supreme Court strikes down the caps, taxpayers will face unlimited liability exposure.

The American Tort Reform Association reports that trial lawyers in Pennsylvania spent $162 million on 1.43 million advertisements in 2023. If personal injury attorneys can dedicate this exorbitant amount of money on just advertising, it’s reasonable to assume they could just as easily reduce their fees (which help to pay for these ads) so victims take home more of their awards for their injuries. Rather than call for weaker taxpayer protections, why isn’t there a bigger outcry to reduce contingency fees so injured victims actually take home more money, rather than personal injury attorneys siphoning off a large portion? By addressing contingency fees, both taxpayers and injured parties would be protected.

It is easy to get swept up in the emotional messaging pushed by many personal injury attorneys. It’s designed to tug at the heartstrings. But it’s important to remember that sovereign immunity and caps on damages were put in place to protect you, the taxpayer. Personal injury attorneys shouldn’t be able to line their pockets at the expense of victims and government entities. Sovereign immunity is an important taxpayer protection and should remain in place.

1 See Legal Intelligencer, Aug. 11, 2022.


Curt Schroder is executive director of the Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform in Harrisburg, Pa. He can be reached at curt@pccjr.org.


Sign up for PICPA's weekly professional and technical updates by completing this form

Statements of fact and opinion are the authors’ responsibility alone and do not imply an opinion on the part of the PICPA's officers or members. The information contained herein does not constitute accounting, legal, or professional advice. For actionable advice, you must engage or consult with a qualified professional.



Load more comments
New code
Comment by from
Cannot find template "~/App_Data/Sitefinity/WebsiteTemplates/PICPATemplate2/CustomLayouts/PICPA_50_50.ascx".

Protect Your Finances with Long-Term Care Insurance - Gallagher Affinity