When considering a merger or acquisition, tax attributes are often not a due diligence priority. Incorrect assumptions are often made about the value and utility of these attributes. An acquiring company can be surprised to find out it cannot use any of the target’s R&D tax credits following the acquisition.
by Jonathan Forman and Michael Wilshere, JD Dec 15, 2022, 07:00 AM
When considering a merger or acquisition, tax attributes are often not a due diligence priority. Incorrect assumptions are often made about the value and utility of these attributes. An acquiring company can be surprised to find out it cannot use any of the target’s R&D tax credits following the acquisition. Worse yet, they may discover that their own future R&D tax credits will be reduced because of a recalculation of base amounts. There are two main reasons for this: Section 383 limitations on credit usage and the incremental nature of R&D credits.
According to Section 383 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), after a change in corporate ownership any general business credits are limited by the same rules by which Section 382 limits net operating losses (NOLs), meaning only a portion (if any at all) may be used post acquisition.
The limitation is approximated based on the following formula:
Base Limitation = FMV of Loss Corporation x Federal Long-Term Tax-Exempt Rate
There is an important exception to the limitation for start-ups. If a company elected to use credits to offset payroll tax and has a carryforward of such credits, the acquiring company can use these credits to offset future payroll tax as the Section 383 limitation does not apply to the payroll tax offset.
The R&D tax credit encourages companies to increase their research spending annually. The bigger the increase, the bigger the reward. There are two methods to measure this increase:
The R&D credit is claimed on a controlled group basis. All entities under common control are treated as a single claimant for calculation purposes, and the credit is allocated to contributing entities via specific rules. When a transaction has occurred, the new corporation acquires the history of the old corporation, including its QREs. This means that a transaction triggers a recalculation of the base amount to which the QREs in the credit year are compared.
If using the ASC method, the situation is less complex but can still be impactful. In this case, the only consideration is QREs. As with the regular method, the acquired company’s history becomes part of the new company’s history. In this case, the new company must adjust its base amount from the prior three years to include the acquired company’s QREs from the same period.
Jonathan Forman and Michael Wilshere, JD, are with Global Tax Management in New York. Forman is a managing director and practice leader in the credits and incentives practice, and can be reached at jforman@gtmtax.com. Wilshere is an R&D tax credit senior analyst in the credits and incentives practice, and can be reached at mwilshere@gtmtax.com.
Order by
Newest on top Oldest on top